THE PERCEPTION OF PARANÁ STATE COURT OF JUSTICE MAGISTRATES ON THE PRACTICE OF DYSTHANASIA

Abstract

The prolongation of life by means of artificial supports has been understood as care.
This conception stems from the idea that biotechnological advances available in
Intensive Care Units (ICUs) can change the prognosis of incurable diseases. This
study aimed to address administrative, civil and criminal liability, instruments to
inhibit and identify the perception of judges about dysthanasia. This empirical
research, carried out with magistrates from the Court of Justice of the State of
Paraná used a virtual questionnaire on aspects related to the practice. The result
showed that 29.1% do not understand dysthanasia; 57.8% understand that the use
of biotechnology represents a beneficial therapeutic procedure; 68.9% emphasize
that the physician should not be held responsible; 94.4% consider Advance Directive
(AD) a suitable instrument to inhibit dysthanasia; and 96.7% admit the need for a
better understanding and reflection on bioethical content.