THE INTEGRATED TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT TOOLS - A KEY COMPONENT OF THE EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58210/fprc3450Palabras clave:
Community-Led Local Development, Cohesion Policy, Integrated territorial investmentsResumen
The publication aims to study the implementation of the instruments for integrated territorial development in the EU in the context of the Cohesion policy. The research framework covers a literature review and a critical comment on the concept of the idea of introducing an integrated territorial approach to achieve convergence, emphasizing the applicable three territorial development approaches in the Member States: Community-Led Local Development, Sustainable Urban Development and Integrated territorial investments. Key conclusions are drawn, which are the result of an analysis of secondary data on the financial performance of the territorial development approaches for the 2014-2020 planning period. The authors focus on the specific challenges that the EU faces in measuring the effectiveness of the integrated territorial instruments in the new programming period. This study also puts an emphasis on the need for the development of a new generation of territorial impact assessment methods, instruments and indicators for measuring combined actions capable of evaluating the integration of EU. Based on an expert assessment of interrelationships, specific recommendations are made to over-come the challenges of implementing and monitoring of the instruments for integrated territorial development during the new programming period.
Citas
Borisov, B., E. Parashkevova, Y. Gospodinov, and M. Stoyanova. „THEORETICAL AND CONCEPTUAL ISSUES OF THE DECENTRALIZATION OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY.“ International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 2022, 23: 445-455.
Barca , F. An agenda for a reformed Cohesion Policy, A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectation. Independent Report for DGRegio. Brussels: European Comission, 2009.
Barca, F., P. McCann , and A. Rodríguez-Pose . „The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches.“ Journal of Regional Science 52(1), 2012: 134–152.
Crucitti, F., N. Lazarou, P. Monfort, and S. Salotti. A scenario analysis of the 2021-2027 European Cohesion Policy in Bulgaria and its regions. JRC Working Papers on Territorial Modelling and Analysis No. 06/2021, S, JRC1262. Seville: European Commission, 2021.
ESPON. „Indicators for integrated territorial and urban development, Policy Brief .“ 2018. https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/Policy%20Brief%20Indicators%20for%20integrated%20development_ (20. 7. 2022 ).
European Commission. „An introduction to EU Cohesion Policy 2014-¬2020 .“ 2014. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/inforat/basic/basic_2014_en.pdf ( 7. 2022 ).
European Commission „Scenarios for Integrated Territorial Investments.“ 2015. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/pdf/iti_en.pdf (7. 2022 ).
European Committee of the Regions. „Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions – Territorial Vision 2050: What future?“ 2015. https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/Synthesis%20report%20Sofia%202018.pdf (29 07 2022 ).
Ferry, M., S. Kah, and J. Bachtler. „Integrated territorial development: new instruments - new results?“ IQ-Net Thematic Paper 42(2), 2018.
Friedman, , M. Results-based Accountability: Producing Measurable Improvements for Customers and Communities. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2009.
Gramillano, A., P. Celotti, G. Famili, B. Schuh, and M. Nordstrom. Development of a system of common indicators for European Regional Development Fund and Cohesion Fund interventions after 2020. Luxembourg: Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy,, 2018.
Kociuba, D. „Implementation of integrated territorial investments in Poland – rationale, results, and recommendations.“ QUAESTIONES GEOGRAPHICAE 37(4), 2018.
Pavlova-Banova, M., D. Kostov, E. Ovchinnikov, Ts. Pavlov, A. Aleksandrova, and M. Stoyanova. „Aspects of financial integration in the context of regional development policy.“ 24th RSEP International Conference on Economics, Finance & Business – Virtual/Online. Vienna: RSEP, 2022. 137-148.
Pavlova-Banova, M., и A. Aleksandrova. „FINANCIAL RESOURCES OF MUNICIPALITIES IN BULGARIA AND EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES.“ International Scientific Conference Globalism, Regionalism, Security. Sofia: UNWE Publishing complex, 2021. 65-76.
PROFIROIU, A. G., C. C. NASTACĂ, and M. Caraman. „Perceptions on the Im-plementation of the Integrated Territorial Investment Mechanism (ITI) and Its Impact on Sustainable Development and Resilience of Danube Delta.“ Transylvanian Review of Admin-istrative Sciences(Special Issue), 2021: 104-126.
„Territorial Agenda 2020 ‐ Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions.“ 2011. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/policy/what/territorial-cohesion/territorial_agenda_2020.pdf (отваряно на 2022).
Tödtling , F., and M. Trippl. „One size fits all? Towards a dif¬ferentiated regional innovation policy approach.“ Research Policy 34, 2005: 1203–1219.
Truskolaski, T. „Integrated Territorial Investments as an Instrument of Urban Policy: The Case of the Bialystok Functional Area.“ European Research Studies Journal Volume XXIII Issue 3, 2020: 757-772.
Van Der Zwet, A., S. Miller and F. Gross. „A First Stock Take: Integrated Territorial Approaches in Cohesion Policy 2014-20.“ European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde, 2014.
Zahariev, A., and others. „THE BANK INSOLVENCY: FROM LEHMAN BROTHERS TO COVID-19.“ INTERNATIONAL REMARKS AND NATIONAL PECULIARITIES Economic and Social Development(58), 2020.
